TSTP Solution File: SET010^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SET010^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 09:02:43 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   21
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   75 (  12 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  448 ( 115 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  529 ( 108   ~; 102   |;  83   &; 229   @)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   21 (  21   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   14 (  11 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (  20   ^  12   !;   6   ?;  39   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    sK2: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    ph4: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    sK5: a ).

thf(f122,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f76,f84,f95,f102,f108,f115,f121]) ).

thf(f121,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f120]) ).

thf(f120,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f117]) ).

thf(f117,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f90,f74]) ).

thf(f74,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f72]) ).

thf(f72,plain,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])]) ).

thf(f90,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl3_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f88]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    ( spl3_4
  <=> ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_4])]) ).

thf(f115,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f114]) ).

thf(f114,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f110]) ).

thf(f110,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f80,f99]) ).

thf(f99,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ~ spl3_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f97]) ).

thf(f97,plain,
    ( spl3_6
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_6])]) ).

thf(f80,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f78]) ).

thf(f78,plain,
    ( spl3_3
  <=> ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_3])]) ).

thf(f108,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f107]) ).

thf(f107,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f104]) ).

thf(f104,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f94,f70]) ).

thf(f70,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f68]) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ~ spl3_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f92]) ).

thf(f92,plain,
    ( spl3_5
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_5])]) ).

thf(f102,plain,
    ( spl3_5
    | spl3_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f23,f97,f92]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
    | ( ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
   != ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
          | ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) )
      @ sK5 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
          & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
      @ sK5 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
          & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
          | ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
          & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
          | ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f6,f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ~ ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                  & ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
              & ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
       != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( ~ ( X2 @ Y0 )
                & ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                & ~ ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
   => ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
                & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( sK1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ~ ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                & ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
            & ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ~ ( X2 @ Y0 )
              & ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
              & ~ ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ~ ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                  & ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
              & ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( ~ ( X2 @ Y0 )
                & ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                & ~ ( X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [X3: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X3 )
              & ~ ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                  & ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X4: a] :
              ( ( ~ ( X1 @ X4 )
                & ( X0 @ X4 ) )
              | ( ( X0 @ X4 )
                & ~ ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [X3: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X3 )
              & ~ ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                  & ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X4: a] :
              ( ( ~ ( X1 @ X4 )
                & ( X0 @ X4 ) )
              | ( ( X0 @ X4 )
                & ~ ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [X3: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X3 )
            & ~ ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                & ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ) )
      = ( ^ [X4: a] :
            ( ( ~ ( X1 @ X4 )
              & ( X0 @ X4 ) )
            | ( ( X0 @ X4 )
              & ~ ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.e3vWwTs2va/Vampire---4.8_29665',cBOOL_PROP_86_pme) ).

thf(f95,plain,
    ( spl3_4
    | spl3_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f35,f92,f88]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f84,plain,
    ( spl3_2
    | spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f53,f78,f72]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f52]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f51]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 ) ) )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f49]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f48]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f41]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f40]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f39]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f38]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f37]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ~ ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
            & ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f76,plain,
    spl3_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f65,f68]) ).

thf(f65,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f64]) ).

thf(f64,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f62]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f55]) ).

thf(f55,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f54]) ).

thf(f54,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
        & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
        & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ( ~ ( sK2 @ sK5 )
          & ( sK0 @ sK5 ) )
        | ( ( sK0 @ sK5 )
          & ~ ( sK1 @ sK5 ) ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SET010^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 16:52:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.35  This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.35  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.e3vWwTs2va/Vampire---4.8_29665
% 0.14/0.36  % (29925)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.36  % (29925)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.36  % (29925)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.36  % (29925)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.36  % (29925)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.36  % (29925)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  % (29925)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.36  % (29925)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.36  % (29925)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.36  % (29925)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.36  % (29925)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (29922)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29923)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29924)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29926)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29928)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29927)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29929)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29926)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.37  % (29926)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (29926)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29926)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.37  % (29926)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (29926)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.14/0.37  % (29926)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (29926)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29926)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (29926)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (29929)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.37  % (29929)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (29929)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29929)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (29929)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.37  % (29929)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (29929)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29929)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (29929)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (29923)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.37  % (29923)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (29923)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29923)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.37  % (29923)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (29923)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.37  % (29923)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (29923)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29923)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (29923)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (29922)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.37  % (29930)lrs+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:hud=14:prag=on:sp=weighted_frequency:tnu=1:i=37:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29924)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.37  % (29927)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.37  % (29922)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.37  % (29922)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (29922)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29922)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (29922)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.37  % (29922)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (29922)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29922)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (29922)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (29921)Success in time 0.011 s
% 0.14/0.38  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------